Acacias can be extraordinarily difficult to ID from photos. There are a lot of species that this is not, and some it might be, but without knowing eg how many individual flowers are in the heads, and without good photos of the front and back of a leaf showing the veins, hairiness if present, and the gland(s) if present, it is not possible for me to say what it is.
With the advantage of being down on the coast and knowing what is currently flowering, I'm happy to call this one longifolia. Flowers are rod type, phyllodes are the right shape, and general form of the plant looks good for that species. But Betty's right, some close-up shots would be helpful in general.
Thanks Betty and Jackie for educating me on what is required to make identification easier. I will endeavour to capture more detail as advised next time.
Yeah, not always easy using just a phone. It seems like it can be hard to get them to focus on close-up shots - they often want to go for the background. You could try sticking a hand in there to give it something more definite to focus on, then whisk it out at the last minute.
Describe how you intend to use these images and/or audio files and your request will be sent to the author for consideration.
Your request has been successfully submitted to the author for consideration.
1,892,903 sightings of 21,038 species in 9,270 locations from 12,880 contributors
CCA 3.0 | privacy
We acknowledge the Traditional Owners of this land and acknowledge their continuing connection to their culture. We pay our respects to their Elders past and present.