Ulladulla, NSW
Identification history
| Blechnum camfieldii | 5 May 2019 | plants |
Identify this sighting
Please Login or Register to identify this sighting.
User's notes
Note name now Parablechnum camfieldii.
5 comments
NicholasdeJong
wrote:
14 May 2019
I agree with the ID. Could you give a reference for the name change please?
plants
wrote:
14 May 2019
Here is the reference:
De Gasper, A. L., De Oliveira Dittrich, V. A., Smith, A. R. & Salino, A. (2016). A classification for Blechnaceae (Polypodiales: Polypodiopsida): New genera, resurrected names, and combinations. Phytotaxa 275 (3): 191 - 227.
De Gasper, A. L., De Oliveira Dittrich, V. A., Smith, A. R. & Salino, A. (2016). A classification for Blechnaceae (Polypodiales: Polypodiopsida): New genera, resurrected names, and combinations. Phytotaxa 275 (3): 191 - 227.
JackieMiles
wrote:
23 May 2019
I'm not up on the swampy places Blechnums - why is it camfieldii and not indicum (apart from distribution)?
plants
wrote:
23 May 2019
I know it at this site; I have submitted a record from here.
The fertile fronds and the auriculate base of the fronds differentiate it, as does habitat to some extent.
The fertile fronds and the auriculate base of the fronds differentiate it, as does habitat to some extent.
JackieMiles
wrote:
23 May 2019
Fair enough. So are you not able to do the confirming of the record yourself? It would be easier if you just confirmed things you are sure of, rather than leaving others to scratch their heads needlessly over them!
Please Login or Register to comment.
Nearby sightings
Location information
- Coordinates 150.477280-35.368180
- Maps South Pacific Heathland Reserve
- Places Ulladulla, NSW
Sighting information
- 4 - 15 Abundance
- 5 Jul 2005 12:00 AM Recorded on
- plants Recorded by
Species information
- Blechnum camfieldii Scientific name
- Common name
- Not Sensitive
- Local native
- Non-invasive or negligible
- Up to 31m Recorded at altitude
- Machine learning
-
In flower
