Inconclusive sighting

Can you identify this sighting?

Unidentified at suppressed - 13 Oct 2024
Request use of media

Identification history

Comments from moderator

Photo quality not good enough to reach definitive ID sorry.
Insufficient or inconclusive evidence 26 Nov 2024 Liam.m
Artamus cyanopterus 13 Oct 2024 ludomcferran

Identify this sighting


Please Login or Register to identify this sighting.

9 comments

plants wrote:
   13 Oct 2024
The bird is not very obvious!
ludomcferran wrote:
   13 Oct 2024
Yes I know. Very hard to take a photo on my phone in the forest. But I know dusky wood swallows. At least a dozen come here every spring and they are immaculate birds with very distinctive flight patterns. I assure you this is a dusky woodswallow.
plants wrote:
   13 Oct 2024
I am sure, but the whole concept is to have verifiable photos.
ludomcferran wrote:
   13 Oct 2024
It's pretty frustrating when you know what is here. I dont have sophisticated camera equipment to give you clearer photos. I could in the open country here but its not in the conservation area so wouldn't qualify. I did note that dusky wood swallows are considered a locally significant bird. Thought it was worth submitting.
plants wrote:
   13 Oct 2024
Indeed, it is listed as threatened in NSW.
plants wrote:
   13 Oct 2024
Indeed, it is listed as threatened in NSW.
BethanyDunne wrote:
   14 Oct 2024
@ludomcferran I don't have a good phone camera for birds, so I post all my significant bird observations through ebird. The end result is the same, the location and information you have on the threatened species is recorded. So then you don't need to have a photo.
ludomcferran wrote:
   14 Oct 2024
Thanks Bethany. I'll list them on the birdlife count too. They even accept bird song as a 'sighting' .
   14 Oct 2024
Hi Ludo,

Appreciate the effort here! It is hard to get photos on the phone camera, an alternative would be to try and record the calls using your phones microphone. You can submit these calls as a sighting they can be verified.

Bethany does raise a good point and we might look into pulling information from other sources like ebird but unfortunately, I am unsure if ebird eventually goes to appropriate government databases like Bionet. Bethany might have more info on this but it's worth investigating.

Please Login or Register to comment.

Sighting information

Record quality

  • Images or audio
  • More than one media file
  • Verified by an expert moderator
  • Nearby sighting(s) of same species
  • GPS evidence of location
  • Description
  • Additional attributes
1,900,751 sightings of 21,152 species in 9,355 locations from 13,000 contributors
CCA 3.0 | privacy
We acknowledge the Traditional Owners of this land and acknowledge their continuing connection to their culture. We pay our respects to their Elders past and present.