Unidentified

1 Can you identify this sighting?

Unidentified at suppressed - suppressed
Unidentified at suppressed - suppressed
Unidentified at suppressed - suppressed
Request use of media

Identification history

Amata bicolor Yesterday ibaird
Amata bicolor Yesterday donhe
Unidentified Yesterday lbradley

Identify this sighting


Please Login or Register to identify this sighting.

Significant sighting

ibaird noted:

24 Feb 2025

Assuming the identification is correct, all sightings of this species I see online are from Far North Queensland (eg. Cairns district) as seen on The Atlas of Living Australia, iNaturalist and BOLD Systems. This may mean it is unusual for this species to be seen so far south in NSW, albeit on the South Coast which is arguably a sub-tropical environment, amounting to an extension of known range for thr species. See a photo of this species p.13, 'A Guide to Australian Moths' , Zborowski, P and Edwards, T. (CSIRO Publishing, 2017).

5 comments

ibaird wrote:
   Yesterday
Pretty fuzzy, but it does have white-tipped antennae.
ibaird wrote:
   Yesterday
A new species for NatureMapr and NatureMapr's South Coast region.
lbradley wrote:
   Yesterday
Does that make it a significant sighting? It’s a joke. I always asked Ciaran if my sightings were significant and he said one day I’d get a significant sighting. I actually do have a couple. 😊
ibaird wrote:
   Yesterday
Fair question. Not really a joke. I think there is a good case that it is! Assuming the identification is correct, all sightings of this species I see online are from Far North Queensland (eg. Cairns district) as seen on The Atlas of Living Australia, iNaturalist and BOLD Systems. This may mean it is unusual for this species to be seen so far south in NSW, albeit on the South Coast which is arguably a sub-tropical environment, amounting to an extension of known range for thr species. See a photo of this species p.13, ''A Guide to Australian Moths' , Zborowski, P and Edwards, T. (CSIRO Publishing, 2017).
ibaird wrote:
   Yesterday
Normally. I would expect NatureMapr would allow me to suugest this is a Significant Sighting, but I cannot that option on this page, yet. I will suggest it as significant if the option appears. OK, it now has.

Please Login or Register to comment.

Sighting information

Additional information

  • privet Associated plant
  • 25mm to 50mm Animal size

Record quality

  • Images or audio
  • More than one media file
  • Verified by an expert moderator
  • Nearby sighting(s) of same species
  • GPS evidence of location
  • Description
  • Additional attributes
825,349 sightings of 21,554 species from 13,388 contributors
CCA 3.0 | privacy
We acknowledge the Traditional Owners of this land and acknowledge their continuing connection to their culture. We pay our respects to their Elders past and present.